Scientific Revolution: Why in Europe?
A lecture by Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy
A lecture by Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy
The Eqbal Ahmad Centre for Public Education (EACPE) seeks to foster the use of science and reason to understand nature and society and so better enable all citizens of Pakistan to participate fully in the political, social, economic, and cultural life of their society; to exercise their democratic rights and responsibilities; to value human rights, democracy and the rule of law; to promote cultural and religious diversity; to raise awareness of global issues and the natural environment; and to advance the goals of international peace and justice.
EACPE is named to honour the life and work of distinguished Pakistani academic, activist, and public intellectual, Dr. Eqbal Ahmad.
“The EACPE record is very impressive, and hopeful — a rarity these days. About the webpage (design), I don’t have anything useful to say. Have little experience that’s relevant. To me personally, the range and choice of topics is appealing and impressive. I can’t think of any useful way to improve it.”
— Noam
(Received on 5th May, 2017. As a member of the EACPE board, Professor Noam Chomsky was asked to suggest how to improve our main page)
V.gud i like it…
Amazing! We need more thinkers like Pervez Hoodbhoy!
Furthermore, I wonder if colonisation, empire etc also had a major part to play in this – we know for example that in ancient India, surgeon had invented plastic surgery to counter the cutting off of the nose etc. Perhaps you could explore this aspect of this sudden progress in industrial and scientific thinking in Europe?
because there was religous surendered against intellectual thooughts.
This is a great website dedicated to Science, rationality, equality of human beings and social transformation.
Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy is so persuasive in his argument ! One thing, why Scientific revolution was brought about by Europe, it seems to me, is continuity and consistency. Hindu and Muslim societies – if not Hinduism and Islam – discouraged individual’s freedom to think. That blocked our science.
I don’t know about the Arab, Chinese, or Hindu civilizations, but here is what Carl Sagan had to say as to why the renaissance flourished in 16th to 19th century Europe rather than the ancient Greek civilization:
“Ordinary people were to be kept ignorant,” Sagan says of the Pythagoreans’ work. “Instead of wanting everyone to share and know of their discoveries, they suppressed the square root of two and the dodecahedron.” And Plato loved the elitism and secrecy, equally, as he argues. Plato was hostile to the real world, experiments, practicality, etc.